XRay Informer
Thank you for 70,000 downloads! CoreProtect support is here!!!
Do you have a minecraft server and have trouble with users x-raying?
XrayInformer may be your solution to get rid of them.
XrayInformer hooks into your server logging plugin and calculates data to tell you if a player is cheating with an Xray mod.
Permissions and Commands
Screen Captures
Technical Info
Works with:
CoreProtect
- and -
LogBlock
Have an issue or a bug? Use the Issue Tracker:
What will be added in later versions?
Faster more efficient search algorithm.Add support for CoreProtect.- Support for Prism
Have calculations only account for natural mined ores, not placed oresUpdate and fix the cleared player manager
As a learning and aspiring developer, I am still looking for some means of support in future school endeavors. If you would like to donate and help support me, it would be greatly appreciated. My plugins are free, and this is optional. If you can't support me through monetary means, please feel free to comment and check out my other plugins as well. Anything helps, thanks!
Be sure to check out my other Bukkit plugins!
HeadshotEffects
SelectivePvP
Comments
-
wesley27oc Owner
-
_ForgeUser8520229 Contributor
-
View User Profile
-
Send Message
Posted Dec 13, 2012It should have a thing where it notifies any op's or anything when a players xlevel get's above a specific level.
-
View User Profile
-
Send Message
Posted Dec 13, 2012@Grave9912
I will look into it. The additional support wont come until after version 3... which should be out in the next few weeks. So probably 3.5 for HawkEye and CoreProtect, if I can do it.
-
View User Profile
-
Send Message
Posted Dec 13, 2012Add CoreProtect Support :D
-
View User Profile
-
Send Message
Posted Dec 13, 2012@Poopfish
There is an updated version of Hawkeye called Hawkeye Reloaded. That version is being updated now and is available for 1.4.5-R0.2.
-
View User Profile
-
Send Message
Posted Dec 13, 2012Why add hawkeye support? it hasn't been updated since March :P CoreProtect support is where it's at (if you have time).
http://minerealm.com/community/viewtopic.php?f=32&t=10390
-
View User Profile
-
Send Message
Posted Dec 13, 2012@jwpwns
a.) can you PM me their names... and b.) can I log onto your server and you give me rights so I can see exactly what is going on? if so, PM me the server IP.
-
View User Profile
-
Send Message
Posted Dec 13, 2012log block pick the 2 players up any other suggestions?
-
View User Profile
-
Send Message
Posted Dec 13, 2012@Malvagio87
You want the code? Well, I really can't do that at this time, as not all of it is mine... but I am working on a full rewrite of the code, and after that is complete, there will either be an API, or I will open it for you.
Also, if you look on github, you may be able to find the old code, not sure if that would help you in the short term.
-
View User Profile
-
Send Message
Posted Dec 13, 2012@Thyrin
Stay tuned... it will probably still be a while, as I am in the middle of a full rewrite of the existing code. So that version will still be LB only, with the HawkEye version coming after that.
-
View User Profile
-
Send Message
Posted Dec 13, 2012@jwpwns
That would not be on my end... If LogBlock is picking up on blocks they break, then we report on it. Have one of them break a stone and then use the LB Tool to see if LB picked up the break.
-
View User Profile
-
Send Message
Posted Dec 13, 2012I just noticed the add-in that HawkEye support may be coming. It would be wonderful :)
-
View User Profile
-
Send Message
Posted Dec 13, 2012i have 2 players that seem to have blocked this when i xcheck there name nothing happens any way to fix? they arent op
-
View User Profile
-
Send Message
Posted Dec 12, 2012any chance you can let me see the files for this plugin ... i want to be able to integrate it into my banning plugin so that when i do /xcheck player:all <sub><sub> instead of the list coming up with</sub></sub>
<playername> <% to stone ratio>
it comes up with:
<playername> <banned or left blank> <% to stone ratio>
that way i can weed through who has been banned already and who needs to be checked.
-
View User Profile
-
Send Message
Posted Dec 10, 2012@kbryantLA24
I will look into this, it shouldn't be too difficult. The only issue I see, is that the declaring a default world in the config would be unnecessary.
-
View User Profile
-
Send Message
Posted Dec 10, 2012Hello, I run a multi-world server, where the default spawn world is not buildable/mineable in by the players. Could you modify the functionality of " /xcheck player:<playername>" to check the player in the current world you're standing in, as opposed to having to type "w:<worldname>" every time? An additional reason people may want this is because I name my worlds "factions1", "nether1", "theend1" for file organization purposes. These names are different from what they are actually called in-game. This makes it confusing to the rest of the staff members. This modification to the command makes it easier to use functionality-wise for everybody with less typing. Thank you for your consideration!
-
View User Profile
-
Send Message
Posted Dec 9, 2012@MinecraftAdmin
Ha, while I appreciate your hint, I am not looking for donations. I just do this for fun.
-
View User Profile
-
Send Message
Posted Dec 8, 2012Awesome job, and thanks for continuing this plugin! Your profile is missing a donation link ;)
-
View User Profile
-
Send Message
Posted Dec 3, 2012@Strahan201
The specific query we would need to run, along with the math to calculate X-ray stats would very much lag spike the server... I know this because I was playing with an idea like this a few weeks ago, an my database is only about 400mb. In a large server with data in the many GB there would be a real issue.
-
View User Profile
-
Send Message
Posted Dec 3, 2012@Strahan201
What is the exact command you are typing? xcheck player:all by itself wont work because you need something to compare to. Try xcheck player:all ore:56 maxrate:3
-
View User Profile
-
Send Message
Posted Dec 3, 2012@rustymetal
Rustymetal, thats not a bad Idea. That is definitely a better way to handle that. I am working on a few other things right now, but I think I will implement something like this.