Bukkit

@Psychoma:

You need to give your users a negative permissions node:

- -bukkitinventorytools.bookshelf.* - -bukkitinventorytools.book.*

Notice there is a second - to remove the permissions and the * to remove all associated permissions. With this BIT should ignore players interacting with the books and bookshelves.

@KCZerG "I am in that class of a very old server and i dont have a day or a week to put 2000 digilocks on everything nor do my premium users want to spend the in game money to lock their roughly 100-300 chests in their plots." Well, no one is forcing anyone to use it, surely not all doors need or should be locked. And if your players don't want to pay it's easy enough to config it for free use (or charge them and let them chose not to lock). Myself I don't lock my chests, I put them in a room and lock the door to the room, saves money and time.

Just a thought that struck me, where should this test block be placed when you try to lock? The space you're trying to lock will already be occupied by a chest or a door, do you delete that, place a block to see if it's ok remove the block and the replace the item that was there already? If you just try to place a block it will fail due to the occupancy and you will get a false "fail" report making BIT think it's not allowed. I think it will be hard to make sure you're covering every possible permutation of plugins, rules etc and to some extent will have to rely on common sense and moderation.

I am in that class of a very old server and i dont have a day or a week to put 2000 digilocks on everything nor do my premium users want to spend the ingame money to lock their roughly 100-300 chests in their plots.

And the build check isnt just about worldguard, remember theres plugins that make places or objects that are not to be locked by just anyone.

The short and simple of it is: This plugin needs to verify that a player is allowed to build in a location they are trying to lock. :) its easy to add to the plugin and its a must!

I have to agree with both sides of what Genij and KCZerG are discussing. Firstly, the way the plugin is built there really is no need for BIT to check what WorldGuard has configured. You build your house, you protect your house and area with WorldGuard. You place a door, chest, lever, etc within that house, you press 'L' while looking at the object and set the Digilock to your preference. At this point no one can reconfigure the the object since the Digilock was set by the owner. As Genij said and as I do on my server, if I build anything such as a Store for everyone. The doors I would Digilock with the users set as Everyone and the Closer Timer about 3 - 5 seconds. Now everyone can use the doors, they close behind you, no one can override my Digilock.

No from the other point of view. BIT gets added to an older server with many doors, chests, etc. People will need time to become aware of the new plugin, learning how to use it and may not have time to run around protecting everything before someone gets the bright idea to cause headaches for the rest. It would also be nice if someone just happened to forget to set the Digilock within their own home on an item.

In short, I feel that it would be a great add-on to the plugin at some point but if BIT is used as intended, it wouldn't be as needed.

@KCZerG

Well if the person that is allowed to build there just locks everything and makes users everyone so that everyone can open the door but not alter the lock your problem is already done. you just need to lock the things just from the start with the right permissions at the user field.

Cause the way you are picturing it. It will mean that the player can't place a configured block there. considering this plugin needs to remove the block. Also you would need to do it for every block you want to lock something on. Which means you will get a massive database with if the person is allowed to lock there or not.

Your digilock HAS to be sure a player is allowed to build on a location that they are trying to lock its very straightforward and a must

I believe this could be done by having the player "place a block" in the location they are trying to lock and have the block disappear immediately simply so your plugin can discern whether a player can place or not, if a player cant place a block in said location theres no way they should be allowed to lock something in that location its common sense man :) im sure its easy to integrate into your plugin at the point of getting position for the lock. have the player "place a block of your choosing" that immediately is removed simply to check that a player can place.

You cant ignore the fact that its required , If a player has no building rights to a location theres no way he should be allowed to lock that location due to your plugin ignoring building rights. that means stopping a player from locking anything in a location which they are not allowed to build not just within worldguard regions.

could you add jukebox locking?

@LastKossack

I believe the Copy, Master and Force buttons for the BITBooks are yet to be implemented as I see them still on Rocologo's ToDo List. Users may have issues moving a book because I believe that if they are not the author of the book they are not allowed to move it. So you have to set it so that they are allowed to move it prior to giving it to them.

Thx for your support Rocologo your plugins is very usefull for the server :)

i think there are some problems with the books, when you change one parameter for example "Copy:" to "true" you'll get "false" (the default option) again the next time you open that book, another one, when you throw your book to other user and the book gets into the other's inventorie the other user wouldnt be able to move out the book, are this bugs or features? :P

Hi, I often recieve this error: 2011-11-19 20:44:55 [WARNING] [BukkitInventoryTools] Missing parameter:SBP.InventoriesShare.BauWelt All works but if I look into my server.log I see this?!

Make sure it's not locked, if it is you need to remove the lock before it can be destroyed.

I use worldguard and same with command (instantpickaxe)

Today i delete it with worldedit but this request is for my member and my member have not access to world edit/instant pickaxe.

Any solution for my member can't desroy a bookshelf??

@nicquehen

I just use a pickaxe and do for superpickaxe :D

Hi !

How i can destroy a bookshelf, i'm admin in creative mode and i can't destroy bookshelf?

(v3.0)